Question; Why should companies recruit people over 50 for senior and responnsible positions?
Answer : Because they are more productive than those below 50!
*Proven!*❤❤❤
A massive study in America found that *the most productive age in a man's life is 60 - 70*
*From 70 - 80 is the 2nd most productive age.*
*The 3rd most productive age is 50 - 60.*
The average age of a Nobel Prize winner is 62.
The average age of a CEO in a Fortune 500 company is 63.
*The average age of the pastors of the 100 biggest churches in America is 71*.
*The average age of Pope's is 76*
This tells us somehow *God has designed that the best years of your life are 60 - 80!*
*It is when you do your best work.*
*A study published in NEJM found that at 60 you reach your peak of potential and continue up to 80!*
*So, if you are between 60 - 70, or 70-80, you have the best and second best years of your life with you!*
Source: *N.Engl.J.Med 70.389(2018)*
Cant find the original article.
ReplyDeleteTrue, prove this article was real by giving its full title.
Deleteme too.
ReplyDeleteNO he podido obtener el articulo original, necesito la informacion del mes y el nr por favor
ReplyDeleteCan we know the author's age .Thank you.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199007053230101
ReplyDelete"Effects of Human Growth Hormone in Men over 60 Years Old" is the article for this link.
DeleteLol. Fake. Fake. Fake.
DeleteCant find it either, and the linked article isnt it
ReplyDeleteOriginal article or study is important to verify, and seems to be untraceable.
ReplyDeleteThe should have been provided
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteLies, repeated lies, published as a blog rather than at a legitimate and reliable news website. Google's search algorithm points right back to the original lies, whether this page or feces-book (no arbiter of truth, they are). Google search returns no news articles, nor the original study (it was, a _massive_ study, wasn't it?). I do have access to NEJM website, and I found no such study.
ReplyDeleteContents might be true, but, if so, no need to substantiate with non-existant article.
In a court of law, even if rest of contents is true, one lousy lie obliterates everything else.